News

Insider Interview with Organist Christopher Houlihan

On his new album “First and Last” (Azica Records), Christopher Houlihan – “the next big organ talent” (LA Times) – performs the two great bookends of French Romantic Organ works, Franck’s “Grande Pièce Symphonique” (1862) and Louis Vierne’s Symphonie No. 6 (1930).

We spoke with Houlihan about the album, Louis Vierne’s tragic life, defining a “symphony” and more:

Tell us how you came up with the repertoire for this album. 

This album includes the two pieces that are usually considered the first and last French Romantic solo organ “symphonies.” César Franck was the first to compose symphonically-scaled music for the “modern” organs built by Aristide Cavaille–Coll in the mid-19th century. These organs allowed for a wider dynamic and expressive range than had ever been experienced and they inspired a rebirth of “serious” music for the organ. One of Franck’s students, Louis Vierne, took this tradition to its zenith. His final organ symphony—the sixth, in B minor—is an extraordinary tour de force for the organist and shows off so many sounds of a pipe organ. The organ at Ascension Church is a 21st century instrument and the first French-built organ in New York—it is a great match for these colorful pieces.

Tell us a bit about Louis Vierne. He had a fascinating life, and you’ve spent many years studying, performing and recording his works. What draws you in to Vierne’s life and his music?

Vierne was born nearly blind and rose to become organist of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris, one of the most prestigious posts an organist can hold, even to this day. In the summer of 2012, I undertook a tour of six marathon performances of Vierne’s six organ symphonies. These pieces were conceived as concert works for the organ, and many are composed with cyclical themes recurring throughout the five movements. For me, they contain a whole range of human emotions, from agony, humor, passion, and even to rage. This is largely my own interpretation of the symphonies, but Vierne’s life was truly tragic and it’s difficult not to see some of his life expressed in the music.

A tragic life?

Yes, despite some professional successes (as organist of Notre-Dame Cathedral), his romantic life had serious ups and downs, the organ at the cathedral was often in need of serious repair (especially post-WWI), and he was passed over for the post of professor of organ at the Paris conservatoire, a position he deserved after years of assisting other teachers. He had a host of illnesses and physical problems, and by the end of his life could barely climb the many steps to play the organ at Notre-Dame. After making one final climb, he died on the organ bench at Notre-Dame, right in the middle of performing a recital.

Both of the major works on First and Last are “organ symphonies”. Since the music is written for organ alone, you’ll have to tell us – what makes these works “symphonies.” What are the similarities and differences from an orchestral symphony?

Well, in the case of Franck, there’s an especially strong connection between the Grand Pièce Symphonique and his Symphony in D minor. The “GPS” can be seen as a prototype of the orchestral work, and they both contain cyclical themes and roughly chart a similar structure. But one major difference is that the organ work is composed for a solo instrument and performer. The organ has historically been a kind of “synthesizer,” and its pipes imitate other instruments—flutes, trumpets, oboes, strings, and especially baroque instruments like the crumhorn and viola da gamba. The mid-19th to turn of the 20th century saw enormous innovation in the art of organ building. Organs hadn’t changed significantly since the 17th century, and were now being built larger, even more colorful, and more capable of playing modern music. These organs by no means sounded like an orchestra, but the instruments Franck and Vierne knew were tremendously expressive and dynamic, and these composers responded by writing symphonically scaled music that exploited all the “new” sounds of these instruments.  I could get more technical, but one very broad comparison might be between that of the harpsichord to piano—the music changed alongside the instruments.

You’re a professional organist, performing concerts around the country as well as overseas, and you teach organ at Trinity College in Hartford. I wouldn’t be surprised if you spend some of your free time away from the keyboards and pedalboard. Tell us about the challenges and rewards of playing the instrument.

One very rewarding but frustrating thing about being an organist is that no two instruments are alike. By and large, the piano is a standardized instrument and there is no comparison to the differences between organs. I arrive two days before a performance just to set up the organ to play the music I plan to play. One organ has two keyboards, the next has four or five. One has 20 stops to choose from, the next has 200. Every moment of the program needs to be redecided, each time I perform. When the organ is wonderful, it feels like having a partner in making the music come alive and those experiences are so satisfying. In my spare time I love to cook, garden, and to play fetch with my dog (who is named for a composer I wish wrote more for the organ—Benjamin Britten).

Gramophone: Christopher Holuihan "First and Last" review

Insider Interview with Rudersdal Chamber Players' Christine Pryn

On April 1, 2023, the Danish ensemble Rudersdal Chamber Players makes their U.S. debut with a performance at Carnegie Hall. We spoke with founding member and violinist Christine Pryn about the group’s early beginnings, what it takes to have a lasting impact as an ensemble, and their collaboration with with composer Andrew Waggoner.

How and when was the Rudersdal Chamber Players created?

The idea came in 2017 – I just had my festival Rudersdal Sommerkoncerter, where Lera Auerbach was the featured composer and she stayed for some weeks after the festival. I was supposed to perform her music at some other concerts with the ensemble I had at that time, but the group broke up and the concerts were canceled. I was devastated and felt so ashamed that I couldn’t keep my promise to Lera, but she and her husband Rafael DeStella were extremely supportive and got me through one of the most difficult times in my career.
It was their idea to form the kind of ensemble I have now, inspired by Camerata Pacifica in Santa Barbara which they collaborate with.
The concept is a flexible combination of instruments so we can accommodate venues of different size, with or without access to a piano. It also gives us options for an extremely wide repertoire and to portray composers performing a much larger part of their chamber works than if we were just a piano quartet or piano trio.
Our base is the piano quartet, but we regularly perform as string trio and piano trio and sometimes also as string quartet, flute quartet, clarinet quintet etc.
Within the first half year of Rudersdal Chamber Player’s existence, we had more than double the amount of concerts I had with the former ensemble and today we earn more than four times as much. So, it was a definitely a change for the better! 

What is the mission of RCP?

We like to focus on music by lesser-known composers including female composers from the romantic era as well as contemporary music. As a performing artist your work won’t last and be remembered like the work of a composer. But with our programming we have a chance to make a difference. If just one of the pieces we have commissioned from composers from Denmark and abroad will be remembered and played by musicians in the future, then we have had an impact on music history. In 2019 we premiered a piano quartet by the Russian-British composer Dmitri Smirnov who died half a year later in the pandemic. It is a true master piece and we are so happy and grateful that he made it for us. It has already been performed by other musicians in other countries, so we are confident that it will be played in the future, and someone will read on Wikipedia (or whatever they will have at that time), that it was composed for us.

You’re performing music by Poul Ruders on the program at Carnegie Hall – any connection between the composer and the ensemble’s name “Rudersdal”?

The similarity of the names is a pure coincidence. The word Ruders is related to “rydning” which is a clearcutting in the woods. Rudersdal is a desirable area a little north from Copenhagen – it is a part of the so called the “whisky belt” where wealthy people enjoy a good life close to the city and close to the sea. But Denmark is still very equal compared to many other countries in the world, so you will also find very modest apartment houses in that area. Historically it was a place where merchants as well as the cultural elite spent their holiday. Grieg was a frequent guest and composed his piano concerto there, and also Hans Christian Andersen enjoyed a long stay at his friend’s place in Rudersdal. 

I decided to start my music festival in that area since there wasn’t already a festival (although there is a rich cultural life), and the ensemble is connected to the festival – hence the name.

Last year we released a world premiere recording of Ruders’ chamber music including the piano quartet, “Throne” for clarinet and piano as well as the clarinet quintet. We had been collaborating closely with the composer who is extremely nice and supportive.
The music is extremely difficult to play together so it has really improved our ensemble work. It is fun to think that when someone will play these pieces in 300 years, they might listen to our recording since it was made in collaboration with the composer.

Tell us about Andrew Waggoner’s piece “Now, the Fire” which was dedicated to your ensemble.

Andrew has been my friend for more than 13 years. He composed two pieces for my former ensemble and Now, the Fire is the first of hopefully more made for Rudersdal Chamber Players.
We are currently working on a project on the Four Elements where we combine music with other arts and science and this was made for FIRE.
It is inspired by James Baldwin’s The Fire Next Time. Andy is very good in telling a story with his music. And since he is an excellent violinist himself it is extremely well written for the instruments.

What do you most look forward to about the group’s American debut at Carnegie Hall?

After years without a chance to travel due to the pandemic it will just be mind-blowing to play in one of the best halls in the world!

Insider interview with the Cassatt String Quartet

The Cassatt String Quartet, founded in 1985, performs a free concert at the Italian Academy at Columbia University on March 30, 2023

We spoke with the members of the CSQ about the March 30 program and about the history and mission of the group. 

Your March 30, 2023 program at Columbia University features works by three American women (Amy Beach, Dorothy Rudd Moore and Florence Price), your quartet is comprised of women musicians, and takes its name from Mary Cassatt, a woman famous for her impressionist artwork in the 19th and 20th centuries. Tell us how this confluence of women connects with the mission of your ensemble? 

CSQ cellist Gwen Krosnick: One central element of the CSQ’s mission and values is our focus on contemporary music - in particular on the music of people whose work may not yet have been as widely represented on stages as we believe it should be. We're delighted to highlight Amy Beach's gorgeous piano quintet, as well as two quartet works by the great Black American composers Florence Price and Dorothy Rudd Moore. Each of these women deserves to be part of the celebrated canon of artists in our field, and it's an honor and a joy to work on their music and bring it to audiences.

I do hope that the painter Mary Cassatt - whose work was so often undeservedly lumped together with other impressionists as a footnote because she was a woman – would, if she were still alive, approve of this concert’s total focus, front and center, on an exuberant and diverse array of artistry that features American women, both in the programming and in the personnel!

 How did you choose the three works on the program? What attracted you to each of them? 

CSQ violinists Muneko Otani and Jennifer Leshnower: In celebration of the 100th anniversary of women’s right to vote, we incorporated Amy Beach’s Piano Quintet into our 2020-2021 season, and we had the pleasure of working with two different pianists: Ursula Oppens and Lydia Artymiw. Beach’s Quintet has gorgeous melodies, rich harmonies and lush Romantic writing. We are looking forward to reuniting with the pianist Magdalena Baczewska, who brings a fresh perspective and artistry to our performances.

Krosnick: With programming, in a string quartet, there's a wonderful balance of individual passions. This program, music by Price, Moore, and Beach, is very much representative of that – there were lots of thoughtful discussions before settling on this together!

It's been a joyful discovery process, with each work individually and also in seeing how the works dialogue with each other, illuminate each other, and come even more alive in each other's presence.

The G major Quartet by Florence Price is a truly great program opener, full of tenderness, miraculously beautiful tunes, and all kinds of experimentation in form: two movements only, the first of which is an adventurous sonata-form structure and the second featuring a gorgeous, hymn-like A section that alternates with an irresistible chromatic tune in the viola. The Dorothy Rudd Moore string quartet, Modes (more about that below), is an exceptionally personal and emotional statement in an entirely different language all her own: deeply chromatic, full of rhythmic choices that add lilt, thorns, and excitement. It is hauntingly beautiful, from beginning to end - or at least until the opening of the third movement, at which point the quartet explodes into joyous dance. The Piano Quintet by Amy Beach is full of high drama and sweeping romance: in some ways emblematic of the romantic chamber music language so many audience members already know and love, but again in a very personal, highly original take. All three of these composers deal in elements we may recognize - gorgeous melody, intricate counterpoint, deep attention to form and meter - but in their hands, each in a different and wonderful way, these elements reveal themselves anew.

You perform the Piano Quintet by Amy Beach with pianist Magdalena Baczewska.  Tell us about your history and association with her. 

Otani and Leshnower: Magdalena and the Cassatt have enjoyed working together over the past six or seven years. Our paths crossed at Columbia University, where she and Muneko are colleagues. She is a very thoughtful artist with great flexibility.

Krosnick: As a newer member of the CSQ, this project is my first time playing with Magdalena. She's a lovely colleague, a beautiful pianist, and a generous collaborator. Because of the Columbia University connection between Magdalena and Muneko, Magdalena is almost like extended family.

Especially in the past several years, we’ve been hearing about, and hearing the music of, the composers Florence Price and Amy Beach. Dorothy Rudd Moore is a less familiar name in American music. Tell us a little bit about her, and how you discovered her string quartet Modes.

Krosnick: I fell in love with Dorothy Rudd Moore's music in 2020; since then I have shared it as much as possible. From the first notes I heard - an astonishing recording of From The Dark Tower, her song cycle for mezzo-soprano, cello, and piano - there has been something in her music, her voice, that I find heart-stopping, irresistible, and so deeply personal. Her Baroque Suite for Unaccompanied Cello is one of my favorite program openers on solo recitals (and I’m performing it this season in New York, Boston, and Ohio).

When I joined the Cassatt Quartet, one of the first projects I advocated for was Moore's string quartet, Modes. My colleagues listened to the work and were drawn in, as I had been, by her chromatic language, the deeply personal voice there, and her incredible skill at writing for string quartet. This quartet is unusual for many reasons, especially how much she is able to accomplish - emotionally and compositionally - in such a brief form. This is a short piece with the impact of a monument.

I believe deeply that Dorothy Rudd Moore is one of the great American composers ever to live. Her chromatic language - horizontal, vertical, melodic, harmonic – is so personal in every moment; her command of form, phrase structure, meter, rhythm are unique. Most importantly, though, like the greatest of all composers one loves: the great skill with which she uses all these distinct, beloved compositional elements to her own undeniable, personal, deeply vivid emotional ends - this big, emotional impact of Moore’s music is hers alone. Her music does not sound like anyone else’s but her own.

The Cassatt String Quartet was founded in 1985, so you are approaching 40 years of music-making. What keeps you going as an ensemble, and to what do you credit your longevity?

Otani and Leshnower: The joy of making music and the opportunity to collaborate with great artists keeps us inspired and challenged. Commissioning and recording works by living composers, many of whom are now long-standing friends and musical partners, has always been a core component of our mission. Teaching also fulfills us. We are honored to serve as a bridge to the next generation.

Krosnick: I'm turning 37 in a few weeks, so I'm admittedly not (yet) the one to answer how one stays present and engaged for four decades doing this! But I will say that at least one common element struck me from my first moments with each one of my CSQ colleagues: a real love not only of the music we play, but of the process of working and trying to come to a new vision and understanding of the pieces together. String quartet life is complex: different egos, priorities, and backgrounds are always at play, sometimes at battle, often at odds. But there's a foundational level of respect for each other and for the act of playing chamber music that I believe we share, and that we try to center in on, even in our busiest and most exhausted moments. I think this helps us keep going!

There will never be enough time to play all the great music for string quartet - old, new, and yet to be composed. The well of inspiration is very literally endless, and it is a privilege just to be able to drink from it each day.

Classical Music Communications, Inc. Celebrates 15 years

A note from CMC founder and Executive Director Gail Wein:

On March 1, 2008, I landed back in New York after a month in Bali and a year in Minnesota. On that day, 15 years ago this week, I launched my publicity and writing company, Classical Music Communications, Inc.

Throughout my career, as a radio host, radio producer at NPR for the program Performance Today, and classical music reviewer for The Washington Post, I’ve had an overwhelming desire to bring music to people. Launching a business as a writer and publicist was a natural next step.

I’ve been privileged to work with a wide variety of artists, from internationally established stars to up-and-coming talents. It’s been uniquely satisfying to spread the word to the world about their work. Happily, I continue working as a journalist, writing feature articles for Playbill, Symphony Magazine, Classical Voice America and other publications, and occasional radio work for NPR, Voice of America, and others. 

I am thoroughly thrilled to celebrate this milestone anniversary of 15 years in the business. The success of CMC is in part due to the phenomenal writers, editors, and producers that comprise the media landscape, who have chosen to cover the artists and projects we represent. It’s been wonderful and gratifying to have major media outlets like The New York Times, Opera News, and NPR write and broadcast stories about our artists.

The artists I work with deserve equal gratitude, especially the pianist Orli Shaham and composer/conductor Victoria Bond, each of whom I’ve worked with for over 13 years; as well as – literally - a hundred other clients. Enormous thanks also to colleagues near and far who have referred new clients and offered advice and ideas. Their generosity of time and spirit have really helped build the business over the years. CMC associates over the years have also contributed immeasurably, especially Jacob Sievers, Geoffrey Landman, and CMC’s current Senior Communications Associate, Caleb Jaster, who has been with the company since 2016.

I’m looking forward to many more fruitful years in the music business. Thank you to all who helped me get to this milestone! 

Gail Wein
New York City
February 27, 2023

Insider Interview: 15 years of CMC with Gail Wein

On March 1, 2023 Gail Wein celebrates the 15th anniversary of founding her company Classical Music Communications. To mark the occasion, Senior Associate Publicist Caleb Jaster sat down with her to talk about the moment. In this insider interview, she reflects on the past 15 years, how the company got its start, what she’s learned, and CMC’s future. Highlights below.

What does this anniversary mean to you?

When I launched CMC in 2008, I didn’t even begin to imagine how the future might unfold. I gathered clients, media contacts and experience day by day and month by month. I continually planted “seeds” in the form of casual conversations after a concert or sending a reaction to a social media post. Some of these seeds took weeks or years to develop into a productive business relationship. As the years went by and the company grew, I realized that the business was not only viable but also firmly established and respected in the industry.

What made you want to be a publicist?

I’ve always had the urge to have everyone know about the music that I know and love. That impulse was well-satisfied throughout my career as a radio host at music stations – not just classical music, but also in the singer-songwriter genre (a format known as “Adult Alternative Album” in the radio industry), and classic rock, which I hosted coast to coast on ABC Radio Networks. My work as a reviewer for The Washington Post and as a freelance reviewer, interviewer and feature writer fulfilled another aspect of the same mission.

How did your former career lead to the founding of CMC?

My work as a publicist is really the flip side of my work as a journalist. (In fact, I continue to be a freelance journalist; more about that below.) I heard from publicists constantly in my job as a radio producer at NPR for the nationally broadcast program Performance Today, and also as a concert reviewer for The Washington Post. I know what kind and what frequency of communications got my attention, and I incorporate that knowledge into my methods in my own publicity campaigns.

I’m used to seeing things from different points of view. This is my fifth career – before working as a writer and radio host, I was an arts administrator, running the contemporary chamber ensemble Voices of Change; before that, I was a computer programmer developing software systems for the US Air Force (I had a top secret security clearance!) and prior to that, I was an actuary working in the insurance business.

In what ways does your current work benefit from said former job/life?

When I left my job as producer of Performance Today, I had a Rolodex of over 1000 industry contacts. In those first months back in New York City, I networked like crazy. I reached out many of the managers, publicists, publishers, record labels execs, recording engineers, performers, composers and others I had gotten to know in my role as acquisitions producer at PT. The main focus of my job was to obtain the concert recordings we used on the program. Five days a week, two hours a day meant we aired about ten hours of programming each week – “feed the beast” was the insider’s term for keeping up with new material for the show. To these contacts, I was the person who helped get their client on national radio, so I was looked upon kindly by many.

What’s the biggest lesson you’ve learned about [being a small business owner/working in the industry/things about the industry – pick one or all] over the past 15 years?

Networking is crucial for every aspect of a business or career in the arts. A brief conversation at a concert, reception or concert could blossom into a publicity project or long term client, a month, a year or even a decade later.

It’s amazing what you’ve accomplished these last 15 years by yourself, moving to NYC without a clear idea about the future. Is there anyone you’d like to shout-out that helped support you along the way?

Absolutely. I wouldn’t be here without the help and advice and generosity of all of my colleagues in the music industry. Many of my fellow publicists – Steven Swartz, Amanda Sweet, Patricia Price, Peter McDowell, referred new clients to me, to name a few. My friend Genevieve Spielberg – who has herself been in the classical music management and publicity business for close to 30 years – is always there to offer advice and concrete solutions.

Thanks to CMC Senior Communications Associate, Caleb Jaster, who has helped keep things going since 2016. And to former CMC associates Jacob Sievers and Geoffrey Landman.

And to my long-time clients, the pianist Orli Shaham and the composer Victoria Bond. It’s a joy working with each of you, every single day for more than 13 years.  

Where do you see CMC in the next 15 years?

I’m looking forward to helping spread the word about music for many years to come. I am constantly learning new ways to help my clients, and – in some cases – lessons about how to effectively run my business and deal with people. A challenge for me will be keeping up with the changing landscape of the industry, especially with regard to technology. As newspapers shed their fulltime classical music writers, as magazines and broadcast outlets consolidate, and as online publications, streaming services and other digital opportunities expand – that is a lot to keep up with. I will be constantly working to stay on top of the shifting parameters – which are always moving targets.

Insider Interview with Ontario Pops Orchestra founder Carlos Bastidas

The Toronto-based Ontario Pops Orchestra highlights the work of women and BIPOC composers and instrumentalists and is one of the most diverse professional orchestras in Canada. Their debut album Breaking Barriers (rel. March 31, 2023) features concertos by Bach and Vivaldi performed by violinists Tanya Charles Iveniuk, Yanet Campbell Secades and bassoonist Marlene Ngalissamy, all led by OPO founder, conductor, and music director Carlos Bastidas.  We spoke to Bastidas about the group’s mission, the new album, and what the orchestra plan’s to do next.

What prompted you to form the Ontario Pops Orchestra?

 In the Greater Toronto Area, there are several professional orchestras and about 20 community orchestras but there no symphonic pops orchestras, so we wanted to fill that cultural gap. We have been very successful in attracting new audiences to our online and in person concerts.

Tell us about the repertoire that is typical for the orchestra to perform?   

In our concert programs, I mix in popular classical pieces as well as movie soundtracks, Broadway songs and light classical concerti.

How did you choose the three soloists on Breaking Barriers?  

I wanted to feature three professional black women musicians to help bring diversity to the classical music world.

What plans are on the horizon for the OPO?  

We are one of the most diverse professional orchestras in Canada. I want to continue to grow that equity and diversity.

We are reaching to new audiences by taking the orchestra from the concert hall into public spaces to perform free concerts for everyone to enjoy, not just the patrons who can afford to pay for concert tickets. Music should be accessible to everyone, everywhere. I feel this is important for the future of classical music.

Insider Interview with Sylvan Winds

On February 19 at the National Opera Center in NYC, the Sylvan Winds present a program of contemporary works for winds and electronics. Featuring a world premiere by the Bosnian-American composer Svjetlana Bukvich, "How many would it take?" by Syrian clarinetist/composer Kinan Azmeh, and works by Allison Loggins-Hull, Phillip Bimstein, Gyorgy Ligeti, Henry Cowell, and the duo Lawson & Merrill (David Margolin Lawson, David Merrill).

We spoke to founding member and flutist Svjetlana Kabalin about the group’s 40+ years in the business, their season, and the upcoming program.

Tell us about the beginnings of the Sylvan Winds. How did the group form? 

The group started on the streets of New York City in 1976. After I graduated from Stony Brook University with a master’s degree, one of my classmates, oboist Mark Hill, called me. He said he had just $20 to his name and wondered if I’d be willing to play on the streets in Manhattan, busking for contributions from passersby. We started on the steps of the Metropolitan Museum and then went down Fifth Avenue to play baroque duos under an arch next to an active bus stop.

Then it was on to Broadway. We played in front of the theater where “The Belle of Amherst” with Julie Harris was playing. That was such a fruitful endeavor that we returned to the streets, along with a bassoonist, on July 4th weekend to take advantage of the crowds gathering all over the city for the Bicentennial festivities. Soon after, we expanded to a wind quintet, performing regularly in front of the Florsheim Shoe store on Fifth Avenue (able to take quick bathroom breaks at the St. Regis around the corner) and meeting celebrities like Rodney Dangerfield and Woody Allen as they walked past the quintet.

In fall of 1976, we performed at the reopening of Tavern on the Green in Central Park, the Bronx Botanical Garden, Brooklyn Library, Queens Museum and elsewhere. We were inspired by the St. Luke’s Chamber Ensemble concert series at the Church of St. Luke in-the-Fields in Greenwich Village, and so in 1978 we began producing our own concert series at the same historic venue.

A woodwind quintet is such an unusual group of instruments – double reeds, single reed, brass and flute. How did this particular combination of instruments become a common genre of chamber music?

The wind quintet – flute, clarinet, oboe, bassoon and French horn - has been around since the second half of the 18th century, after the invention of the clarinet, so its history goes back nearly 300 years. Up until the 20th century, there wasn’t much music composed for this combination of instruments. However, from the 20th century to the present the repertoire has increased dramatically, and there are many wonderful works from which to choose, as well as many interesting arrangements of earlier works, such as Renaissance dances from the 17th century, popular pieces and core repertoire originally written for string quartet or orchestra.

What are the advantages or benefits to performing as a woodwind quintet? The challenges?

It is always a privilege to get together with colleagues to play chamber music. For wind players, it is fun to both fraternize and play beautiful music. But it is also challenging. Unlike string or brass players, who produce sounds in the same way, each of the musicians in a wind quintet produces sounds in different ways. There are only two instruments that are related, the oboe and bassoon, because of the double-reed. Otherwise, the flute, clarinet (a single reed) and horn (a brass instrument) are completely different. So, the challenges are matching timbres, intonation, and especially balances. The flute has the most limited dynamic range and the horn can obviously play very loud, so balance is very important.

The canon of works for woodwind quintet is fairly small, especially compared to that of, say, string quartet. Tell us about some of the repertoire you’ve discovered or created, and how you adapt other works for your instrumentation.

Over the past twenty-five years, we began exploring the quintet repertoire of different countries, which added a new dimension to the wind quintet program and was always very well received. Then, when the Sylvan Winds began partnering with different historic cultural venues throughout the city, the concerts became even more interesting and diverse. We have been fortunate to perform in the Great Hall at Ellis Island, the Eldridge Street Museum, Scandinavia House, and have played every year for the past 13 years at the Hispanic Society Museum & Library in Washington Heights.

We have also always been curious about past composers whose music was forgotten or under-performed. For example, we were involved in uncovering works that were performed by Georges Barrère, a French flutist who arrived in America in 1905. (Envious of the Boston Symphony Orchestra’s French wind section, the New York Symphony Orchestra’s music director, Walter Damrosch, brought Barrère along with three other French wind players and a trumpeter to New York to play in his orchestra.) During his time in America, Barrère commissioned over 140 works by Americans including music by the Black composer William Grant Still, and many women composers. These, along with the ragtime music written by young American women at the turn of the last century were the basis for our 2019 album “Music of the Gilded Age”.

Three quite diverse programs make up the Sylvan Winds 2022-2023 season: French repertoire in December, new music with electronics in February, and Spanish dance forms in May. How do these programs, and this season, fit into the mission of the ensemble?

The 2022-23 programs reflect the heart of our mission, creating compelling programs that engage audiences. Chamber music is a powerful form of communication, both for the performers and the audiences. The group is small and nimble enough to engage audiences in many different kinds of venues and with incredibly enriching programs. French repertoire is very near and dear to wind players, because the French Conservatory training developed during the 19th century gave French composers richer palettes of color, inspiring extraordinary orchestral works such as La Mer, Bolero, Daphnis & Chloe, and Afternoon of a Faun. And playing music of French composers in the historic Church of Notre Dame in Morningside Heights that has a large French and Hispanic community, seemed like the perfect way to share this tradition.

We are very excited, as well as humbled, about the program in February with electronics. It is new territory for us, but clearly a music experience that looks toward the future. And of course, we always love returning to the Hispanic Society, and our performance there in May celebrates its reopening after several years of renovation. We’re collaborating with flamenco dancer Eva Conti, Portuguese guitarist Pedro Da Silva, and percussionist Rex Benincasa for this program.

The Sylvan Winds is in its 44th concert season. What’s next for the group?

The group is looking forward to more collaborations with other performers, including our “American Voices” program with Emmy award winning baritone, Kenneth Overton; our “Tango Nuevo” program with bandoneonist Leandro Ragusa and guitarist Federico Diaz; and our collaboration with tap dancer Max Pollak (yes, tap dance!) that began with a “Woodwind Motion” concert for Composers Concordance. We also have some other very interesting programs planned, but aren’t ready to give it away just yet………

"Ray Charles and Me" an essay by Victoria Bond

RAY CHARLES AND ME
By Victoria Bond

It all started with Quincy Jones. He was composing an immense oratorio called “A Black Requiem” for full orchestra and chorus, with Ray Charles as featured soloist. He was working on it with my composition teacher, Paul Glass.  Quincy’s lessons each week were right before mine, and Paul introduced us. As we became better acquainted, I followed his progress on the work with great interest.

The Requiem was powerful and traced the history of black slaves coming to America, beginning with slave ships coming to America and continued through the Watts riots in Los Angeles. Ray was narrator, preacher, storyteller, and participant. When the work was premiered with the Houston Symphony, Quincy invited both Paul Glass and me to attend the rehearsals and premiere.

During rehearsals, when not onstage, Ray and Paul whiled away the time playing chess backstage.. Taking the opportunity to get to know Ray, I sat in as an observer on their games.  Ray was curious about me and my work, and when I told him I was a composer, he quipped “If you are a legitimate composer that makes me an out of wedlock composer!” Ray was funny and witty and loved a good joke. He had an acute sense of hearing that allowed him to be aware of everything around him, and he was endlessly curious and inquisitive.  Quincy had structured the Requiem with  Ray’s talents in mind, and being close friends since their childhood in Seattle, he knew every nuance of Ray’s personality and musicianship.  He created room for Ray to improvise and be spontaneous, and the orchestral and choral portions of the Requiem were organized around this.

However, during the rehearsals, Quincy made changes to the orchestral parts.  His work in film and recording allowed him the freedom to change things on the spot, and he applied that experience to the less flexible world of the symphony orchestra.  These musicians were accustomed to playing the repertory of composer long dead, who could not interrupt with any remarks or criticisms, and conductors rarely, if ever, changed the notes in the score unless there were errors.  For Quincy to edit his music as the rehearsal progressed and to make changes to the musician’s parts as he discovered a better version than what was on the page, violated the norm. The players were not shy with expressing their displeasure, and Quincy was frustrated with their lack of flexibility. He was able to make some changes, but I am sure he would have wanted more had he not encountered such resistance.

The concert was a tremendous success and Ray’s part was so skillfully written that he appeared to be making it up on the spot. The choral and instrumental writing was powerful and the audience cheered and rose in a standing ovation at the conclusion.

 

Conducting Ray Charles in Richmond

That was the last time I saw Ray for several years.  The next occasion was when I was invited to conduct the Richmond Symphony in a pops concert featuring Ray. The music consisted of his normal repertoire of rhythm and blues, country and western and standards. I expected to receive the kind of scores I was accustomed to using for a symphonic concert, with all of the parts notated. Instead, I received either a piano part with no indication of any other instruments, or worse, just one instrumental part. Standing on the podium in front of the orchestra with so little information was an exercise in Zen, and I had to recreate the score in my head as we played and I could hear what each instrument was doing.

Being someone who conducts a lot of opera, I was accustomed to working closely with singers and adjusting my tempos to their breath and the ebb and flow of the music. Few operas have steady tempos for long periods of time. Flexibility of the beat, known as “rubato,” is the hallmark of the romantic nature of opera, and allows the music to either hold back or rush forward as the emotion being expressed dictates.  So when the first rehearsal began, I watched Ray and slowed down and speeded up when he did, matching the tempo of the accompaniment to his voice as I would do in opera.  He stopped me and said, “No, no!  You keep going and I will catch up with the bus.” This was completely new to me. I did what he wanted and held the tempo steady as he wove around it. Sometimes he was so far behind the beat that I thought he had forgotten what came next, but in an instant, he was right there, synchronized perfectly. This was one of Ray’s signature abilities. His voice had the natural flow of speech. It was never mechanical or stiff, but dipped, dived and vaulted around the beat, surprising the listener with the revelation that this music was alive, vibrant and spontaneous.

I was told that at the end of one of the pieces, Ray would improvise for a long time as the orchestra held the final notes, and I was to wait until a movement of his shoulder gave me the signal to stop. Anyone familiar with Ray’s playing style knows that he famously swayed from side to side, leaning left and right. We were in performance, at the end of the piece in question, and Ray was wailing on the keyboard, swaying back and forth.  This went on for what seemed like an eternity and I watched his shoulder like a hawk to try and discover when I was to cut off. Just then, his left shoulder went down with a decisive motion and I thought this must be the signal, so I cut off the orchestra.  Thankfully the audience cheered and applauded noisily afterwards, because Ray was furious.  He started yelling at me right on stage because I had obviously mistaken his signal and should have continued to hold.  I wanted the floor to open up and swallow me.  Here was my opportunity to work with the legendary Ray Charles, and I had blown it.  I would surely never work with him again. I was shamed in front of the orchestra and was completely humiliated. 

After the concert I slunk back to his dressing room to apologize, expecting him to fly into a rage for ruining the performance.  He was, on the contrary, cheerful and forgiving. “Don’t worry,” he said, “You’ll get it right the next time!”  The next time? I thought in disbelief. He actually wanted me to conduct for him again even after what I did?  I had to be sure where to cut the orchestra off if there was to be a next time, so I checked with the drummer, perhaps the most important musician of the hand-picked soloists who traveled with Ray to each of his orchestral engagements. The drummer looked at me, knowing what had happened at the concert, and said “Watch the right shoulder, not the left one.” So that was it. I never made the same mistake again.

Recording A Black Requiem

After the concert I reminded Ray that we first met when I had attended the rehearsals and concert of “A Black Requiem” and asked him if he had performed it since then. He told me that Quincy had been so upset with the orchestra’s behavior and never wanted to have it performed again.  I asked Ray if HE would want to do the work again if I could program it on a concert, and he assured me that he would. “You’ll have to convince Quincy first,” he warned me, skeptical that Quincy would budge from his position. I told Ray that at the time I was the Music Director and Conductor of the Roanoke Symphony in Virginia and was sure that the orchestra would be thrilled to perform the work. Now my challenge was to convince Quincy.

I contacted him, explained the situation and emphasized that Ray was eager to do the Requiem again, and that I had an orchestra ready and willing to perform it. As is turned out, Quincy lived a short walking distance from my mother’s house in Los Angeles, and several months later, when I was visiting my mother, he invited my husband Stephan Peskin and I to lunch at his home. He met us at the door, casually dressed and elegant. He had a full-time cook and we ate a delicious lunch, listening to stories about his many projects.  After lunch I finally broached the subject of the Requiem. “There’s no score,” he said. “It’s all little bits and pieces in a big box. Nothing has been touched since the premiere.”  I asked if there was a recording, and there was an archival one made at the concert. I explained that I could match up the bits and pieces of the puzzle to the recording and create a score. I told him that Ray was eager to do it again and that I had an orchestra and chorus eager to present it, and I was eager to conduct it.  I pleaded with him to let me try to put it all together. Reluctantly he agreed, not certain that I could decipher his scattered notes and make sense of them.

He went over to a cupboard and started to pull things out of it.  “Come here and help me, Steve,” he said to my husband.  As the two of them sat on the floor, Quincy began to hand him statues and plaques, one after another. It was an amazing sight – Grammy Awards, Emmy Awards, Academy Awards and Tony Awards – all hidden away in a cupboard!  Finally he found the box he was looking for and dragged it out.  It was piled high with loose pages and bits of paper, scraps of music and assorted messages – a real mess!  “Here it is” he said, looking at me with an “I told you so” expression that challenged me to make some semblance of order out of this chaos. “Do you think you can do it?” he said. “If I can have the recording, I KNOW I can do it” I confidently replied, all the while wondering if I actually could.

That was the beginning of the great adventure. The bits and pieces were not as disorganized as I had feared, and once I was familiar with the recording, I was able to put them together into a cohesive score. The set of parts followed and after a Herculean effort, the work was ready for performance.  Ray was excited. The Roanoke Symphony was ecstatic. Gospel choirs from local churches rehearsed for months to learn the choral portions of the Requiem. The community was at fever pitch. To have Ray Charles in person performing with their orchestra, conductor and choirs was nothing short of a miracle. 

Ray arrived and immediately everyone wanted to have their picture taken with him.  He was courteous and generous, and very patient. The first rehearsal went smoothly and the minute I got home, there was a message on my phone from Quincy. I called him back immediately and he was as excited as kid, wanting to know how it went, and if there were there any problems, and asking me how did it sound, etc. I reassured him that it was a brilliant work and the orchestra and the choir loved it, and that Ray was as pleased as could be. “You know he can be the Ayatollah” Quincy warned me.  “Look out for his temper. It is fierce!” I assured him that Ray had been a perfect gentleman and hadn’t yelled at me once, remembering the dressing down I had received years earlier.

The performance was a sensational success, and Ray was so impressed with the performance of the orchestra, the choir and me, that he told me he wanted to return with a recording crew and record the work!  This was a heady prospect. The date was set, the orchestra and choir rehearsed again, and Ray arranged for an enormous truck, filled with recording equipment to park in front of the Roanoke Civic Center.  There were cables everywhere and technical crew rushing about adjusting microphones and rearranging the stage.  Ray flew in and supervised the setup, listening with superhuman precision to the takes as we recorded them.  At one point when the orchestra was playing a particularly complex passage, layered with contrapuntal textures and thick harmonies, Ray shouted “Where’s the harp?  I don’t hear the harp!”  How anyone could possibly hear such a soft instrument in the midst of that din was unbelievable. Sure enough, the harpist had lost her place and was not playing.  What an ear! I was impressed. We all were impressed except Ray. That was how he heard. It was just normal for him to hear every detail.    

On Tour with Ray

After that recording session, I became Ray’s regular conductor for his orchestral concerts and traveled all over the country and even to Poland with him.  It was what I called my post-doctorate musical training, as I learned so much from working with him that I had never learned at Juilliard.  The schedule generally consisted of flying to the location, having one rehearsal and a concert and flying back the next day.  Very often Ray would not show up for the rehearsal, and I attributed this to his confidence in me.  I must confess, however, that the first time this happened, I was surprised and concerned, never having done a performance without the soloist being at the rehearsal. Ray, of course, had performed thousands of times, knew his repertoire and was the consummate showman in front of an audience.  He was always on the road and hardly ever stayed at his Los Angeles studio and home for very long.  The audiences gave him energy, and he loved them and needed his intense schedule for sustenance.

He always stayed at Holiday Inns because he knew the configuration of the rooms, which were always identical, and he could maneuver them without assistance.  He did have someone who was always with him, guiding him onto the stage and helping him with the everyday assistance a blind person would need.  I remember walking through the airport with Ray and his assistant.  I was a few steps behind them and as they walked, I saw people do a double take once they realized who he was.

In September of 2000, I was in the midst of rehearsals for an opera in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania when I got a call from my husband.  “Ray just called and he said he needs you right away!” I called Ray’s manager Joe Adams who said yes, Ray wanted me to conduct his 70th birthday concert and he needed me to come the next day.  “Where is the concert?” I asked. “In Warsaw, Poland” was the surprising answer. “We have a first-class ticket waiting for you.  Just get to JFK tomorrow. This was a real challenge. Of course I was honored to be asked to conduct Ray’s special birthday concert and I wanted to go, but I did have an obligation to the opera company and I would need to get their permission to leave the rehearsal for a few days.  I spoke to the director. “Are you kidding?” he said. “Of course you should go.  This is a historic moment. We are OK managing the staging rehearsals without you.  Just let us know when you will be back.” The schedule was tight: I would fly overnight to Warsaw, rehearse that afternoon, perform the concert that evening and I would fly back the next day. There would be no problem missing two days of rehearsal.

The last concert I conducted with Ray was at the New Jersey Performing Arts Center.  As we were about to go onstage, Ray said to me “You play piano, don’t you?” I confirmed that I did. “At the end of the concert you and I are going to play a little duet!” I gasped. I was going to play a duet with Ray Charles? Where was the music? How could I do this? But Ray was off, walking onstage to the huge ovation of the thousands of fans in the audience.  I panicked. Was I about to crash and burn in front of thousands of people? Maybe Ray was only kidding. Maybe he would forget.  Throughout the concert I was praying that he would forget. 

But sure enough, at the end of the concert Ray made an announcement. “And now, ladies and gentlemen, I have a little surprise for you.  The Maestro and I are going to play a duet.  Come on over to the piano bench, Victoria,” he commanded.  What was I to do? Shaking all over, I walked like a condemned woman to the guillotine. “Sit down beside me, Victoria,” and I obeyed.  Then he whispered in my ear “just follow me. The song has only three chords. It’s very easy.” And so it was. Ray was as relaxed as though he was entertaining a few friends at his house.  His relaxation infused me and calmed my agitation. He began alone so that I could hear and see the chords and what he was doing, and then I joined him.  This was fun! It was such an exhilarating feeling that I didn’t want it to end, but finally we had to, and the crowd went wild!

 

Ray’s Final Years

A couple of years later, I saw Ray in New York where he had invited my husband and me to attend a performance with his big band at a jazz club. At the end of his set, he announced that his favorite conductor was in the audience and asked me to stand. People looked around in amazement to see a petite, white woman. “Come backstage and say hello” he said as he left the stage. My husband has been with me to many concerts where I go backstage to congratulate the artist, particularly when it is someone I know. He hates this ritual, which he calls “kissing the ring” as though the artist in question were royalty, expecting a sign of obsequious fealty from his subject. So when I dashed back to see Ray and was met by him giving me a huge hug that lifted me clear off the floor, Stephan hung back. “Where is that man of yours?” he bellowed.  “Or is he too proud to come backstage to see me?” Stephan heard this, as did everyone in a 10 block radius, and he came backstage where he and Ray embraced warmly.

 The last time I saw Ray was at his studio in Los Angeles.  My husband and I drove there at his invitation. He was very sick, and had not been performing for some time.  We were met by his manager, Joe Adams, who brought us inside.  “Look out!” Joe shouted, “Blind man driving!” and just then, Ray sped towards us in an electric wheelchair.  He was thinner and frailer than I remembered him being, but his robust personality was undiminished. He laughed and joked with my husband and me, and although we did notice a large number of medications covering his desk, he seemed his old self.  I was devastated by the news of Ray’s death in June 2004.  We knew it was coming when we saw him, but wanted to hope that somehow he would charm even death and live many more years.

Conducting Ray Charles’ Music with Stockton Symphony and Billy Valentine

I am grateful for this opportunity in February 2023 to bring Ray’s music to a new audience at Atherton Auditorium with the Stockton Symphony and with the brilliant singer/songwriter Billy Valentine. Billy knows Ray’s style so intimately, and he brings an impressive background of his own accomplishments to the program. He grew up in Columbus, Ohio where his parents owned a nightclub, Club Faces, where his five brothers and seven sisters worked. “We had people lined up around the block to get in because my mother and father greeted you at the front door,” Valentine recalls. “And my sisters would work the cash register while brother and I worked the stage. When there was a break, we would call our sisters to come up on stage to sing with us as well. It was a family operation.” His skills as a song writer allowed him to collaborate with greats like Will Jennings, the Neville Bros. and the immortal Ray Charles. 

It is a privilege to work with Billy Valentine and the Stockton Symphony, and we both look forward to bringing Ray Charles’ songs to life at Atherton Auditorium.

Victoria Bond on WQED's Voice of the Arts

Insider Interview with Pianist Orli Shaham

On January 27, 2023 Orli Shaham makes her Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra debut performing John Adams’ piano concerto “Why Must the Devil Have All the Good Tunes?” with David Robertson conducting. In this Insider Interview with Classical Music Communications, Shaham talks about the “gnarly,” aspects of the work, Martin Luther, working with the FRSO for the first time and more.

Please give us some insight into the composer John Adams, and this piece, “Must the Devil Have All the Good Tunes?”

The style of “Must the Devil Have All the Good Tunes?” is classic Adams. It has a great deal of rhythmic drive and intensity, and thick and rich harmonies that are quite gnarly. In fact, he uses the word “gritty” to describe the sound of the first movement. There are some beautiful moments of repose where he sets the scene for lovely reflection, almost meditative kinds of sounds. The piano becomes part of the orchestra in those moments, for example, in the second movement. In the third movement, the overflowing rhythmic joy is similar to the qualities in "Hallelujah Junction," (one of my favorites of John Adams’, which I recorded with Jon Kimura Parker on my album “American Grace”).

Can you explain the title of the piece? 

The phrase has been attributed to Martin Luther, the 16th century theologian. This was one of those situations like "Hallelujah Junction" - John Adams thought that it was a title just waiting for a piece. He had the line first, and then conceived of the composition. There's a lot of devilish influences, just like in Lizst’s Totentanz, or the devilishly difficult writing of Paganini, who was himself considered a devilish virtuoso. And there are references to gospel, which are also related to the theme.

This is your debut performance in Finland. You're familiar with the composer John Adams, and the conductor, David Robertson, of course. What about the Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra?

I've heard so many great recordings from this orchestra, and I've known many wonderful Finnish musicians. I'm very excited to actually go to Finland to work with some of those same musicians.

Gramophone Review: Mozart Piano Sonatas Vol. 2 & 3

GRAMOPHONE Review

MOZART Piano Sonatas Vols 2 & 3 (Orli Shaham)
By Jed Distler

The following is an excerpt. To read the full review, visit Gramophone.co.uk

The stylish intelligence and pianistic refinement distinguishing the first volume in Orli Shaham’s Mozart piano sonata cycle (released in 2020) continues into Vols 2 and 3. She rightly brings out the operatic subtext of the A minor Sonata, K310, probing the Allegro maestoso’s gnawing dissonances and generating tension through dynamic understatement in the Presto finale. Her beautifully sung-out Andante cantabile manages to be expansive and flexible without losing shape or continuity. In the opening Allegro of the F major Sonata, K332, Shaham gives distinct character and breathing room to each theme, and astutely brings out the composer’s cross-rhythmic phrase groupings. The Allegro assai’s vertiginous runs truly scintillate yet never lapse into square regularity; sophisticated accent placement and subtle elongations keep the listener guessing, so to speak.

Insider Interview with Composer Mark Abel

Two song cycles form the cornerstone of “Spectrum” (Delos, DE 3592) by acclaimed composer Mark Abel, which features some of the most outstanding voices on stage today: Hila Plitmann, Isabel Bayrakdarian, and Kindra Scharich. Trois Femmes du Cinema (Three Women of Cinema) is about cult figures Anne Wiazemsky, Pina Pellicer and Larisa Shepitko. Two Scenes from “The Book of Esther” is a provocative excerpt from an opera in development. The album’s impressive array of instrumentalists includes pianist Carol Rosenberger; fellow pianists Dominic Cheli, Sean Kennard and Jeffrey LaDeur; Alexander String Quartet violist David Samuel; Pacific Symphony concertmaster Dennis Kim and cello star Jonah Kim.

Despite starting your classical music career while still involved in a different line of work (journalism), you have made an impressive mark with critical acclaim and six albums (!) under your belt. What made you want to write concert music? 

Classical has been my principal interest for many years, though initially it was as a fan only. For a good portion of my 21-year journalism career, I wasn’t certain I’d be able to raise the quality of my spare-time composing to clear the invisible bar of credibility that would result in my work being taken seriously. But I kept at it, juggling creative breakthroughs with strong doses of self-criticism. Finally, by the early 2000s, I felt confident I’d developed my own voice. Getting the music heard, recorded and performed since then is another story, of course.

Tell us about how your background prepared you for this path?  

My father was quite a devotee of pre-20th century music – Mozart, Beethoven and Brahms in particular. So in my childhood I got meaningful exposure to classical on a high aesthetic plane. But I began rebelling in my early teens, abandoning it in favor of the innovative modern jazz of the era. I did understand jazz deeply enough to realize I lacked the discipline to master it as a player. The best rock of the ‘60s, however, proved a viable entry point. I quit college after two years and went hard at this music for an extended period. It wasn’t until the late 1970s that I began facing the hard truth that rock is quite a limiting medium and further creative growth in that context would be impossible for me. With hindsight, it now seems inevitable that I would make my way back to classical, starting with a long period of catch-up to learn about the many composers I wasn’t familiar with. Happily, I was ready and eager to sink my teeth into this – but as a fan, not a composer. That came later.  

How would you describe your compositional voice or style?  

There’s a strong streak of lyricism in my work, in both the music and words (which I often write myself). The melodic component is important to me, and it’s never far off -- probably ingrained due to my prolific songwriting in the rock field. But I’m not a neo-Romantic. I’ve listened to a lot of progressive and avant-garde music over the years and elements of this can be heard in my output. Put simply, I’ve absorbed a lot of musical styles over time and it’s always been my goal to synthesize them into a cohesive – and hopefully seamless – original style.   

How has that voice evolved over the course of the six albums and your years of composing?  

Good question. Lately I’ve been re-listening to some of my earlier “serious” compositions and am getting some fresh perspective. It’s clear that the basic shape of my style has been set for some time. In the last six years or so I’ve been experimenting with differing iterations of a fully formed identity – a 100 minutes-plus opera (something I didn’t think I’d ever attempt), expanding my range of expression in song cycles and lyric writing, and, perhaps most significant, becoming comfortable writing chamber music. This last element has definitely stretched my horizons. One always wants to make every note count but chamber music is in many ways the ultimate test.      

You’ve collaborated with many brilliant performers across the albums, some of whom are featured on Spectrum. Tell us about how you got to know one or two of them, and how working together came about.  

The one I’ve worked with most extensively is the soprano Hila Plitmann – best known for her collaborations with John Corigliano, David Del Tredici and Richard Danielpour. She’s an absolutely fabulous and unique artist, dedicated from the start of her career to being a vessel for new music. Hila has very much inspired me to forge ahead and be more daring. I was very little known when I came cold calling in the summer of 2014, but that didn’t matter to her. What did was my song cycle The Palm Trees Are Restless, the first of what has grown into a sheaf of six projects together. I’ve also been blessed and am proud to have attracted such eminent musicians as David Shifrin, Fred Sherry, Isabel Bayrakdarian and Carol Rosenberger. But I find a special gratification in working with people on the way up, like pianist Dominic Cheli and mezzo-soprano Kindra Scharich; I’ll be very happy if their fine work on Spectrum helps boost their profiles.        

What do you hope listeners take away from Spectrum?  

I’m self-taught and didn’t come up through the familiar academic routes. This sets me apart in some respects from most composers; for example, very few write their own texts. I consider my composing an authentic reflection of who I am from an artistic and intellectual standpoint. And I think most people sense that after spending some time with my work. Spectrum is the broadest survey to date of what I do, and I hope listeners find the “content” resonating with them on more than one level.   

Insider Interview with Organist David Enlow

In honor of the 200th anniversary of composer César Franck’s birth, the organist David Enlow presents an all-Franck recital November 17, 2022 at The Church of the Ascension in New York City. Enlow is uniquely poised for such a commemoration. His recording of the complete organ works by Franck (Pro Organo, 2012) received critical acclaim, with l'Orgue praising his “perfect technique, inventive, flexible, vigorous musicality.” In this insider interview, we speak to Enlow about Franck, his place in the organ repertoire, and what makes this recital so special.

How and when did you get interested in playing organ?  

My grandmother (like a lot of grandmothers!) had a small electronic house organ, and when I was five years old, my idea of fun was to play Christmas carols when different family members would arrive – the only thing that has changed is that it’s now the arrival of a procession with incense and clergy!

What is Franck’s place/role as a composer in organ repertoire?  

Franck is called the ‘Father of the Symphonic School’ but in many ways that is organ world jargon – Franck was a great Romantic, a spiritual and introspective composer with great personal burdens who created beautiful soundscapes on a colossal scale.  Franck is a greater composer, in skill, inspiration, and craftsmanship, than the generations of organist-composers who followed, those who wrote principally for the organ.  Franck should really be considered a singular figure in organ music, and if organists will treat his music as Romantic music, in the way pianists approach the accompaniment to the violin sonata, all will become clear. 

What has drawn you to Cesar Franck’s compositions?  

The combination of beautiful melodies, soulful, moving harmony, intelligent voice leading and counterpoint, and the grand scale of the pieces, all contributing to a dramatic arc in each piece. 

What revelations did you have about Franck in the process of recording all of his organ music?  

I found the pieces that are regarded as “lesser Franck” can polish up really well with a few thoughtful interpretative decisions.  The ‘Final’ for example – it’s carnival music, but carnival does not mean unsophisticated, especially in 19th-century France.   

The Grande Pièce Symphonique is criticized for being sprawling and incoherent, but if you had only heard goofy renderings, Berlioz’ works would face the same judgement.  And of course, when I learned the works of his that I didn’t already know, it informed my existing interpretations of the works I had lived with since teenage years.  I was able to notice more common patterns in Franck’s compositions, devices that he loves to use and harmonies that recur, which make us more aware of which are his most special moments. 

What’s special about the organ at Church of the Ascension? 

I’ve made much of the fact that it was made in France, as opposed to American organs built in a French style by Americans who have studied that style.  It’s like the difference between champagne and a sparkling white wine from our country – the champagne doesn’t have to prove its French-ness, it just is.  So, when I am drawing stops at this organ, everything I need to play Franck is present and ready to go.  I don’t have to say “well, there is no French trompette, so I’ll make do with so-and-so.”  That French-ness aside, this is also a beautiful instrument with the scale, color, and variety to make Franck’s music come alive.  Not to discount our own native instruments -- that same level of scale, beauty, and color are also present in many American organs (otherwise I wouldn’t have recorded the Franck works at St Mary the Virgin in Times Square!)  

What are one or two of the most important things that listeners should know about Franck and his work?   

The most important thing to know is that this music comes from a time when spirituality and spectacle were aligned.  Franck prays quietly, and then moments later, he summons the titanic resources of the pipe organ to rend the heavens. There is virtuosity, kindness, intimacy, grandeur – so much is contained and expressed in this music. 

Insider Interview with Momenta Quartet (new dates)

Momenta Quartet presents its annual Momenta Festival September 15-18, 2022 (rescheduled from June). All four concerts will be at the Broadway Presbyterian Church (601 W 114th St. New York, NY), and admission is free.The seventh edition of the festival features four diverse chamber music programs each curated by a different member of the quartet. In this insider interview, we spoke with two members the quartet about their unique programs.


The September 17 program is curated by violinist Alex Shiozaki and features special guests Nana Shi (piano) and David Byrd-Marro (horn) with works by Hiroumi Mogi, Brahms, and Grażyna Bacewicz.

Could you tell us about the music of Grażyna Bacewicz? 

The Polish composer and violinist Grażyna Bacewicz (1909-1969) reminds me of quite a few mid-20th century composers who balanced an advanced sense of tonality--bordering on atonality--with great emotional content. Many of Bacewicz’s earlier works leaned more in the Romantic direction. I was already familiar with the relatively early Sonata No. 3 for Violin and Piano as well as the Quartet for Four Violins, both of which were written in a more romantic and almost neo-Classical idiom.  

Her music hits all the right buttons with me: some drama, some dissonance, some classicism, all in a well-balanced and well-written package. Certainly it helps that she was an accomplished violinist as well as a composer, and the notes lie well under the fingers. As a relatively late work, the Piano Quintet No. 2 leans farther away from familiar harmonies while raising the drama and suspense. The fiery virtuosity and tense melodies will keep you on the edge of your seat--as it does for us, too! I am ecstatic that we will be joined by pianist Nana Shi (who is also my wife), who will be making her third appearance on the Momenta Festival. 

The program includes a piece you recently premiered – In Memory of Perky Pat. How did this piece come about? 

In addition to playing great works from the distant and recent past, Momenta is all about discovering the music of today and giving it several hearings.  

We premiered Hirofumi Mogi’s In Memory of Perky Pat (for horn and string quartet) at Music From Japan’s 2022 Festival concert in New York City. We were joined by the terrific horn player David Byrd-Marrow, and had such a good time performing the piece that we decided to do it again! Inspired by the Philip K. Dick short story “The Days of Perky Pat”, this piece also reignited my interest in classic science fiction and led to an all-night binge of a collection of PKD short stories.  


The September 18th program is curated by violinist Emilie-Anne Gendron and includes works by Mario Davidvosky, Julian Carillo, Beethoven, and the world premiere of a quartet by David Glaser written in memoriam Davidovsky.

What did Mario Davidovsky mean to you and the quartet? 

Mario Davidovsky’s music figures prominently in creation of Momenta Quartet. In 2004, the composer Matthew Greenbaum invited our violist Stephanie to put together a group that would perform Davidovsky’s String Trio for events celebrating Judaism and Culture at Symphony Space and at Temple University. This proto-Momenta, as it were, so enjoyed playing together that they decided to add another violinist and form a quartet. From then the group’s evolution was set into motion: a few member changes later (as is common and natural in the vast majority of groups) and here we are.   

I never had the chance to meet Mario Davidovsky before his passing in the summer of 2019, but I knew of him as one of the compositional giants of our time.  

My own first experience playing Davidovsky’s music arose during the very strange summer of 2020. I had recently become associated with the annual Composers Conference, a summer festival devoted in large part to embracing contemporary music and emerging composers (and which Davidovsky directed for 50 years). In August 2020, the Conference planned a Mario Davidovsky virtual memorial concert consisting of his complete set of Synchronisms. (The “Synchronisms” series consists of 12 independent works composed over 40 years for various combinations of acoustic instruments and tape. The pieces are particularly visionary for their exploration of melding such disparate sound worlds.)   

I was invited to be one of the performers for his Synchronisms No. 2 for flute, clarinet, violin, cello, and tape. With COVID still very much disrupting in-person work, my collaborators and I met via Zoom to discuss matters of interpretation, practiced our parts individually with the tape and a click track, recorded each of our parts separately (with the conductor tuning in on Zoom to oversee and unify each performance)—after which our tracks were all overlaid and stitched together to form the virtual concert. Despite all the disconnection, the experience sticks in my mind fondly as being one of my first “real” projects to arise post-lockdown, indicating hope that we might one day be performing again. I was intrigued by the color, variety, whimsy, and sheer imagination of the Synchronisms. Synchronisms No. 9 (for solo violin and tape) was on my repertoire wish-list, and I am looking forward to performing it on this year’s Momenta Festival.  

The other Davidovsky-related strand: The New York-based composer David Glaser had agreed to write a new quartet for the Momenta Festival. I had no idea until seeing the finished score a few months ago that David decided to dedicate this work in memory of his teacher and mentor Mario Davidovsky. In the spirit of honoring the various past influences that go into forming what we are today, it seemed only natural to program a Davidovsky piece alongside David’s quartet, hence the inclusion of Synchronisms No. 9 on my concert. 

What’s the significance of ending the program with Beethoven’s “Serioso” Quartet? (Why Beethoven? Why this quartet?) 

The short answer as to “why Beethoven?” and “why this quartet?”: practicality. Perhaps I shouldn’t be revealing how the sausage is made, so to speak—but when it comes to programming decisions, not all of our reasons are highbrow! Sometimes it’s just because we happen to have been playing a piece we love recently, and so it’s logical to include it on a festival program – particularly one on which there are several less familiar works we are preparing with finite rehearsal time. Also, as a quartet that frequently focuses on new works and premieres, we savor any chance we get to delve into standard-repertoire pieces via repeated performances. 

The “Serioso” has been on our quartet’s wish-list for as long as I can remember. Originally, our violist Stephanie had conceived of a festival program for Fall 2020 on which “Serioso” would be juxtaposed with avant-garde German-Argentinian composer Mauricio Kagel’s surrealist 1971 film “Ludwig van,” and featuring a top-notch lineup of improvisers who would collaborate with Momenta. With that in mind, we even began rehearsing the “Serioso” in early 2020, but of course, the pandemic threw all sorts of future planning into disarray. As the pandemic progressed, our programming timelines naturally fluctuated. The subsequent Momenta Festival ended up taking place virtually in June of 2021 (thanks to the generous assistance of the Americas Society) but for that one, we had already decided to program another Beethoven work, the monumental Grosse Fuge, for Alex’s program. We finally reprised “Serioso” for the 2021-22 season and had a pretty good idea that it would go on this festival. As various ideas were thrown around, and as guest artists and aesthetic considerations gradually fell into place, for a while it spent time on each of our programs. In the end, my colleagues generously let me have it, but the truth is that each one of us could (and did) come up with some version of a program that interestingly juxtaposed the Beethoven with contemporary and lesser-known works (a hallmark of a typical Momenta concert). 

As for why it ends the program: despite its condensed length, this piece is an emotional heavyweight. It is brusque, restless, tense, emotionally raw, and often violent. 

Other than the coda, which is disarmingly fleet and joyful, the vast majority of the work feels like an existential scream into the void—after which, what more can possibly be uttered?  

Insider Interview with Sarah Plum

The ever-adventurous violinist Sarah Plum has long been a champion of contemporary music. Her latest release, Personal Noise (BGR 619, rel. June 2022), features new music for violin and electronics by living composers, many of which were written especially for Ms. Plum. The collection includes works by Mari Takano, Mari Kimura, Kyong Mee Choi, Jeff Herriot, Charles Nichols, Eric Moe and Eric Lyon. We recently spoke to her about electro-acoustic music, improvisation in Classical music, the new album, and more.

When did you know you wanted to focus your performance career on contemporary music?  

It wasn’t  ever a conscious decision,  but I have always been interested in contemporary music and modernism.   After the release of my first solo CD Absconditus, the new music part of my life went into overdrive, with more concerts, residencies, commissions and collaborations.  It was a lot of fun and I also felt a sense of a mission to get music created, played and heard.   

And I think my background has contributed to this focus : I grew up with artist parents (my Dad was a painter and my Mom was a potter) in a contemporary house that was designed by a friend of theirs.  So from an early age I was exposed to people creating contemporary art and collaborating on creative projects as a way of life. I never imagined a musical life without playing new music and working closely with living composers.  

I moved to Europe after I completed my DMA at Stony Brook and had the good fortune to take part in historic concerts and premieres of new music, playing with groups like Ensemble Moderne, Musik Fabrik, Ensemble Contrechamps, Nieuw Ensemble Amsterdam, on tour and at prominent festivals and venues.  I liked the people and the music and wanted to continue to be a part of this world, which felt very sympathetic to me. 

Also in Germany I met Sidney Corbett.  He asked me to premiere his solo sonata Archipel: Chagall  at the Landesmuseum Mainz in a gallery full of Chagall’s prints. This was the start of a long and productive collaborative friendship that persists to this day. Most recently Sidney wrote me a solo sonata based on Bach’s Sonata No. 2 in a minor for solo violin (the first in a series of commissions for works based on each of Bach’s 6 solo Sonatas and Partitas).  I played part of it in Mannheim, Germany before the pandemic but it hasn’t had its full premiere yet. 

This collaboration also gave me a template for what I wanted to do: work closely with composers with lots of repeat performances of their works.  I am an advocate for composers and their pieces.  For the most part I am not going to add pieces to my repertoire that are played and recorded a lot already.   All the composers I play are quite successful, they have good teaching jobs, get commissions, have gotten Guggenheims and Fulbrights and Barlows etc.,  but they are not household names.  It is important to me to bring these works to a larger audience and give them many repeat performances.     

Your new album, “Personal Noise” is entirely music for violin and electronics. Tell me about “electronics” as a “duo partner”. How is it to play along with, react to and interact with electronically-generated sounds? 

It can be difficult with what we call “fixed media”  - which is a  multi layered recording created by the composer.  It is fixed and unresponsive so I have to make sure I match and line up with this unyielding duo partner! On the positive side it is reliable and easier to do in the sense that it is always the same.   

Live electronics is a much more fluid experience with flexibility, which opens up all sorts of possibilities.  It is much more like working with a person as a partner, but it sometimes can be unreliable, and there is more set up and the sound check,  and sometimes things malfunction. I love working with MAX and other live electronic programs and it has been exciting to play these pieces.  

Tell us some of the different kinds of electronics used in the works on “Personal Noise.”  

Eric Moe, Mari Takano and Kyong Mee Choi’s pieces are with fixed media. Each tape that the composers made is super rich, full of different recorded and electric sounds and quite gorgeous.  I love playing these pieces in concert because it is like having an orchestra in your back pocket.   Mari Kimura, Jeff Herriott and Charles Nichols’ piecesare with MAX msp.  In Mari’s piece the electronics react to my and Yvonne’s pitches, so whatever we do, certain sounds come out of the electronics in a really lush and beautiful way.   Jeff’s piece has a variety of things going on - loops and some chance elements, which I love.  In concert it is different every time;  for the CD we chose the versions we liked the most.  Charles’ piece is, in many ways, the most ambitious.  It is made of recorded sounds, and my playing is also recorded and processed in real time.  So it is me recorded, me live and me processed - and affected by the motion sensor on my hand.  Really cool! 

How did you start playing electronic music? 

For the release of my first solo CD Absconditus, I had a concert on a series at the Berlin main train station.  Sidney  Corbett introduced me to his friend Mari Takano, whom he met when they both studied with Gyorgy Ligeti in Hamburg in the 80’s. She sent me the piece and a CD of the audio track that I played with.  I really liked the piece and liked the variety it gave me on programs of music for violin alone - I performed it over 50 times.  Then I played a piece by Matthew Burtner (my first Max piece) and fell in love with live electronics, the freedom and the potential for unusual sounds.  Next, Jeff Herriot wrote me the piece that is on “Personal Noise”.  At each step I learned more about the technology and was continually challenged with new technology and techniques.    

How much room is there, within the works on this album, for improvisation and/or variation between performances?  

 For the CD it is only Jeff Herriott’s piece that  has some choice elements and improvisation. At the concert I gave at Constellation in Chicago in May 2022 ( on Youtube), Laurie Schwartz’ss work was improvisatory.  The rest are all notated, or things happen in a chance way based on the program, but not related to what I am doing.    

What do you hope listeners take away from the album; and/or the art and craft of performing a live instrument with electronics? 

I hope listeners enjoy it and  have their perspective expanded, perhaps even have their mind blown a bit.  It’s an opportunity to learn about some composers new to them, and possibly inspired them to experience more of their music.  I hope I can give them a sense of the breadth of what is out there and an openness to explore further.   

Insider Interview with Andrew Garland and Eapen Leubner of Art Song Colorado

The acclaimed baritone Andrew Garland is front and center on a new album of songs by Gabriela Lena Frank, and Dmitri Shostakovich on Art Song Colorado’s label (DASP 005, release date August 5, 2022). “El Rebelde” (“The Rebel”) brings together the vocal compositions of Frank and Shostakovich, two composers who transformed Spanish language song through their innovative settings. In this insider interview, we spoke with Mr. Garland and Art Song Colorado founder Eapen Leubner about the new recording. 

Why did you want to record / produce a recording of / this particular repertoire? 

ANDREW GARLAND: I have been in love with Gabriela’s music since 2006 when I first met her and the Songs of Cifar [a collection of songs by Frank, two of which were premiered by Mr. Garland]. The driving rhythms, the jazz harmonies, the non-classical vocal techniques, the Spanish language, the high F#s and Gs. I feel that all of these are my strengths. And let’s be honest: any performer chooses a piece partly because they can sound good doing it. And besides her innovative music-making, I adore Gabi’s philosophy: when western “classical music” assimilates another culture, it must make both cultures equal: one culture can’t dominate the other.  

EAPEN LEUBNER: It is sometimes a challenge to decide what to produce. In this case, Andy's passion for the music of Gabriela Frank shone through. I was new to the music but hearing the repertoire made me made the decision easy. 

What do you think makes this music distinctive? 

EL: Gabriela's compositional voice merges many regional styles but still frames the music in the traditional art song format of piano and voice. The music plays around the edges of the genre by using some sprech-stimme techniques and spoken word, longer piano solos and a musical language that pairs with the poetry like a fine wine with a beautiful dinner.  

AG: To start, the poetry sources are a little off-the-beaten path, even for 21st century “art song”. 

For centuries, composers have written music that has the piano imitate other instruments. Songs of Cifar will someday be a cycle for orchestra including Nicaraguan marimba (the Nicaraguan marimba has reeds hanging from the bars that add a buzzing sound) and charango (a small guitar after which an entire Pan-American genre is named). In the second song, “Me diste ¡oh Dios! una hija,” the piano imitates both these instruments at the same time. And Jeremy Reger, our pianist, is on fire when he plays this. This song more than any has the driving rhythms I was talking about. 

And the vocal score. I mentioned the high notes. I when I first started working with Gabi I mentioned to her that F# was my favorite high note. There are a few juicy ones in the first song (“El nacimeiento de cifar”) and she wrote in several more for the premiere of “Eufemia.”   

By the way, I put “art song” in quotations above because there needs to be a better name for the genre. Most people I know - including other musicians - are put off by the term. Other people ask what “art song” is, I tell them, and then they’re put off by the term. I heard an anecdote: once Samuel Ramey bumped into Barbara Streisand in an apartment building in New York. A mutual friend introduced them and said that Sam is a singer. She asked him “Oh, what tunes do you sing?” They’re all tunes (provided they have a melody which all of these songs do, thank goodness. 

How does this repertoire resonate with Art Song Colorado’s mission? 

EL: Art Song Colorado (ASC) is dedicated to introducing new audiences to the art song genre. Our projects have included video, puppets, live performance and albums that focus on a theme. Our secondary mission is to support the artistic vision of Colorado artists. "El Rebelde" spoke to me because we hadn’t yet seriously delved into new Spanish-language music and I've admired Andy's career and musicality from a far. This was a two-fer for me. 

What does Gabriela Frank’s music mean to you? 

EL: I've only known Gabriela's music for the past year and yet, I frequently find myself humming fragments of melody and thinking about lines from the recording session. Her music is, for me, a beginning. I've been given a gift to produce this inaugural set of pieces. If you notice the numbering on the Cifar songs, there will eventually be thirty of them. If fate is kind, I want to be a part of this all the way through to a complete recording that will tell the Cifar songs from beginning to end. 

AG: I love sharing music that I love with an audience. I love introducing audiences to new music that makes them think and feel. I love giving audiences renditions of songs they love. In the past 15 years, Songs of Cifar have gone from being one to the other. 

Why was music by Shostakovich chosen for this album, and why this particular set of songs? What makes it a good pairing with Frank’s songs? 

EL: The idea of the album title "El Rebelde" came from the third Cifar song. We knew that we wanted to pair this music and contrast Gabriela's music with music that would be similarly grounded, yet profoundly different. The Shostakovich had the similarities of the Spanish melodies but, unlike Frank's music, these songs were connected to Russia by both language and harmonics. Both composers show a rebellious streak by remixing the classical art song from a mono-culture (think German Lieder or French Chanson) into a blending of cultures. The result is something that is Russian or Spanish or Nicaraguan and is more than the sum of the parts because they have been so seamlessly combined. 

AG: Including the Shostakovich Spanish Songs was Jeremy’s idea. He first suggested it because of the Spanish language connection: these are Spanish folk songs originally in Spanish, translated to Russian. These are a composer writing about another place and all of the mixed, conflicting feelings he has for that place. As we got to know the songs better we discovered that these songs also bring together two cultures seamlessly with both at the fore, neither behind the other. 

Gramophone: "it's a joy to hear the gleaming singers of Variant 6"

Insider Interview with Momenta Quartet

Momenta Quartet presents its annual Momenta Festival June 14-17, 2022. All four concerts will be at the Broadway Presbyterian Church (601 W 114th St. New York, NY), and admission is free.The seventh edition of the festival features four diverse chamber music programs each curated by a different member of the quartet. In this insider interview, we spoke with each member of the quartet about their unique programs.

Note: Moments Festival VII has been re-scheduled for September 15-18, 2022. The section about the June 17th program (which happened as scheduled) is below. For info on the forthcoming programs click here.


Momenta Festival VII closes out on June 17 with a “Juneteenth Celebration” curated by violist Stephanie Griffin. Her program includes a world premiere by Jazz bassist and compsoer HIlliard Greene, alongside works by Alvin Singleton (whose complete string quartets were just recorded by Momenta) and Yusef Lateef.

Momenta Quartet just released a recording of Singleton’s complete String Quartets. What compositional style through-lines do you see in these works, and what makes them stand apart?  

It was quite a journey to learn, perform and eventually record all four string quartets by the esteemed African American composer Alvin Singleton. Delving into his complete works (so far!) for this medium gave us all deeper insights into the development of his musical language.  

Interestingly, the last quartet we learned was his first, which he composed in 1967, which we are featuring on our Momenta Festival Juneteenth celebration concert on June 17th. Cast as a Passacaglia and Fugue, it is the most “traditional” of the four pieces on its surface. It opens with a lyrical cello solo in a somewhat expressionist vein. The viola joins – followed by second and first violins, engendering soulful free atonal counterpoint. Variations ensue – building up to the whirlwind of activity, which will be the fugue. I introduce the fugue subject on the viola – and what a subject it is! It is unusually long for a fugue subject and it abounds in jagged rhythms and wild turns of phrase. Not your mother’s fugue – or maybe it is – depending on who your mother is! This quartet seems so different from the other three, but if you isolate the solo lines, Alvin’s distinctive melodic style is already apparent.  

I think the main way in which he changed stylistically between this first quartet and the other three was adopting his own distinctive brand of “minimalism.” I hesitate to even use that word, since it has the connotations of Philip Glass and Steve Reich – or even Feldman, on the other side of the minimalist spectrum. Getting past those conceptions of what “minimalism” is – I think it applies to Alvin’s music in his use of repetition, large-scale sections of rhythmic and even pitch unisons (especially apparent in String Quartet no. 4 “Hallelujah Anyhow”) and his signature use of silence.  

You will not hear this in String Quartet no. 1, but a hallmark of Alvin’s compositional style is the way he juxtaposes wildly different sections with long silences in between. It’s as if, after String Quartet no. 1, he replaced the traditional idea of “development” with an almost Zen-like approach of letting the listener experience sections of music with wildly different expressions and giving them the silences in between to draw their own connections. 

One of the quartets was written for Momenta. How does this work stand out, and is there any particular traits the group has that the composer incorporated into the work?  

String Quartet no. 4 “Hallelujah Anyhow” was commissioned for Momenta by Chamber Music America, and we had the joy of premiering it on our last in-person Momenta Festival before the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2019.  

It stands out in its bold and uncompromising use of unisons. Like his string quartets Nos. 2 and 3, it shows Alvin using his signature technique of juxtaposing contrasting sections with dramatic silences in between. But while those pieces have extended sections in rhythmic unison, “Hallelujah Anyhow” starts with a long and arresting passage with all four of us in pitch and rhythmic unison – and that material keeps recurring throughout the piece. It’s brash, bright and rhythmic. To me it evokes the feeling of a big band at times. The unisons are broken up by glimmers of slow, dark harmonies, which will later take more prominence in the piece.  

One would have to ask Alvin himself (but he probably won’t tell you!) if he factored in the personality of Momenta itself in this commission. If I may blow Momenta’s horn for a moment, though, I think this kind of writing shows that, based on his extensive experience with us in our performances of his second and third quartets, he knew he could trust us to be able to play this! It is no small feat to pull off a performance with all the pitch unisons and jagged rhythms. Out of all of his pieces, this was by far the most challenging in the recording session. (Alvin Singleton: Four String Quartets available for purchase here)  

How did you get to know Alvin Singleton and what attracts you to his music?  

We first met Alvin Singleton when Tom Buckner invited us to play his second and third quartets on Alvin’s 75th birthday concert on the Interpretations series at Roulette. On that same concert I played his solo viola piece “Argoru” and his graphic score piece “Be Natural” (1974), which I will be playing with Michael and guest bassist Hilliard Greene on the June 17th Momenta Festival program.  

We immediately loved Alvin both as a human being and a composer. Many things attract me to his music  - above all its freshness, originality and sense of spontaneity. As an improviser myself, I feel a kinship between Alvin’s aesthetic and the world of avant-garde jazz. And it turns out that Alvin is not directly trying to mimic jazz in any way, but he had tried his hand at it on the piano many years ago and has deep friendships with some of today’s leading figures in avant-garde jazz, including Wadada Leo Smith and Henry Threadgill. We will honor that by including the great jazz bassist Hilliard Greene in our interpretation of “Be Natural.” 

Insider Interview with Violinist Maya Magub

During the global pandemic, the British-American violinist Maya Magub – like so many others – turned to music for solace. Her recording of Six Consolations by Franz Liszt (five of which were arranged by her, and recorded here for the first time), with the pianist Hsin-I Huang is on a new album, “Consolations” (CRD 3540, release date June 3, 2022). In anticipation of the June 3 album release, singles are released on April 22 (Consolation No. 5) and May 13 (Consolation No. 3).. We recently spoke with the violinist and asked her about her arranging these iconic works, the recording process, her career in Hollywood, and more!

You’ve said that, because the album was made during the pandemic, you had quite a unique recording process - and that sometimes it was a more “democratic” process. How did that work? 

Yes. Hsin-I and I had been playing together before the pandemic, and one of the things I was most sad about losing out on at the beginning of it all (alongside the global toilet paper shortage anxiety!!) was the ability to play chamber music. The idea for this project came to me very early on, and I think it was my way of feeling connected. I never feel isolated if I have my violin with me! So, after recording several film scores from my newly-assembled home studio, I realized it could be possible to make a violin and piano album this way, with lots of discussion and collaboration but recording separately. 

Of course it is always ideal to play together in the same space, but we did find some really surprising silver linings in the process of recording remotely. We couldn't begin by playing through the music, but in the early stages of rehearsal that often results in one person imposing their vision on the other (ok, yes, often the violinist...!!). This time we had to begin with discussion.  

Before any recording could happen, it was necessary to map out which of us had the part with the most momentum at any point (either a whole piece or sometimes sections within a piece) and let that person record first. In the transcriptions of piano pieces, it sometimes felt right to give Hsin-I the freedom to record first without any prior discussion, as she would choose to play the solo piano version. There were times when her recording would be a surprise to me, because I had envisioned an entirely different tempo.  

With the Bach/Gounod ‘Ave Maria’, for example, I had imagined playing it slower with long drawn out legato lines, suited to the violin’s greater ability to sustain. If we had been rehearsing in a conventional way I would probably have stopped early on and suggested a slower tempo, and she instinctively would have followed my rubato in certain places. In this case, her recording was so beautiful, sincere and profound that, though I had imagined it differently, I hated the idea of changing anything. Because of our unusual recording process, I had the chance to listen and play through with it many times and, over time, I found small ways to use rubato in its original definition - robbing time but then giving it back. I found that it was possible to feel free enough without stretching the overall tempo, and came to feel that I had made it 'my own'.  

Later, I discovered that the piece first came to life while Gounod was improvising over someone else’s rendition of the Bach (the piano line). So perhaps this unusual process had actually allowed us to approach the music in the same way, by honoring the Bach and adapting to that rather than treating it as an accompaniment.  

We had a similar experience with one of the Liszt Consolations - No. 5. Again, Hsin-I's vision was faster than I had imagined, but sounded beautiful. I just had to rethink and keep an open mind. After living with her recording for a while I realized that slurring more notes together made a huge difference, and I now can't imagine the piece any other way!  

Of course there were also times when one of us felt strongly about a passage after it had been recorded, and that we couldn’t play it that way with enough conviction to make it our own. These were times to take advantage of the ability to re-record after more discussion (without needing to rebook a studio!). All in all it took a LOT of time, but was very much a musical collaboration, just as it would have been recording conventionally.   

How did you approach creating the arrangements of Lizst’s Consolations for violin and piano? How are they different from the original score for piano solo? 

In thinking about music as consolation, I remembered that Milstein had transcribed the wonderful ‘Lento Placido’, Liszt’s Consolation No 3, and I wondered what the other 'Consolations' would sound like for violin and piano. It was so exciting listening to them, because it was so easy to imagine them this way, and that's how this whole project evolved. 

Much of Liszt's Consolations have obvious melody lines perfectly suited to the violin, and there are often musical echos that work well as a piano ‘answering phrase’. Tempting as it was to steal all the best melodies for the violin(!), an important part of the transcription process was to find moments where the violin should rest and the piano answer. After that, it was a question of making the new piano part flow logically in its own right, sometimes adding and sometimes  taking away so that the voice-leading made sense in its own right. 

I was lucky with the keys: The set of six Consolations oscillate between the contrasting keys of D flat and E major, both of which lie very well on the violin. The key of E major uses the brightness and natural resonance of the E string, and D flat has a contrasting richness. In Consolation No. 4, which has a prayer-like quality, I realized I could introduce another color by introducing the mute - 'con sordino'

It felt important to make use of the full pitch range of the violin, and it was natural to use two different registers for a repeated melody, or to play in octaves. Liszt uses a lot of thirds and sixths in the melody of Consolation No. 5, and they translated well. Occasionally the original voicing felt awkward on the violin, and it was fun to find the most violinistic way to keep the original harmonies by inverting some of the intervals. This one felt a lot like a Kreisler encore by the time I'd finished!  

The mini 'cadenza' in Consolation No. 6 was another fun moment to transcribe: the notes had to be changed to make them lie well on the violin, but within Liszt's original contours, and it was exciting experimenting with different patterns until it felt 'right'. I tried to think about what Milstein may have done, an my inspiration was his transcription of No. 3 with it's mini cadenzas. 

The album is aptly titled Consolations – not just because the works by Liszt are the focal point of the album, but the whole collection is meant to console. What music did you listen to during the last two years when you needed consolation? 

Like so many people, I found myself listening to all sorts of different music during the pandemic. And sadly, with war and inequality rife in the world today, we are no less in need of consolation now. Sometimes we need upbeat music to cheer us up, but I often find that slower, more nostalgic music brings consolation by making me feel understood, in a way that more precise verbal language can’t.  

The other pieces on the program came from piles of my father's old albums for violin and piano, full of the best loved tunes - some written for violin and piano, and others transcribed from operas or the piano repertoire. I had performed many of these over the years for the wonderful UK charity, 'Everyone Matters', which brings concerts to care homes and hospices. The audiences there are so appreciative of a really great melody, especially one they remember from their past; but these short pieces are so well known that musicians tend to look down on them.  

Somehow the pandemic gave me back the ability to appreciate them for what they really are and draw on them for my own consolation. Choosing the selections for the album was a great opportunity to frame every piece within this theme of consolation, and I realized afterwards that this had made me approach and play them differently. Certainly listening to them as a collection feels very different from hearing one in isolation as an encore, and gives them an extra weight and profundity. I hope that's something that other listeners will feel on some level and take away from the album. 

In addition to your own albums, you have a career in Hollywood, featured on countless movie soundtracks and pop recordings. Out of all these projects, are there any that stand out from the others as favorites, or ones you were most excited to take a part in? 

Oh so many...! I really feel so lucky to be doing what I do, and to be immersed in it here where it all happens. I love walking into a studio - Fox, or Warners or Sony - where they are busy building sets for a movie, and knowing that Clint Eastwood can just wander into our recording at any moment! Every time we play for John Williams is a dream: the music is sublime and he hears everything. From Star Wars to his solo violin album with the wonderful Anne Sophie Mutter, it has been amazing just to be in the same room as him. I've had many exciting moments with icons like Burt Bacharach; Bono at the Hollywood Bowl (where Bill and Hillary Clinton asked to meet the musicians afterwards!); and Adele at the Grammys. We have worked with Alan Menken, Hans Zimmer, Danny Elfman... many legends and many exciting times!